Chandigarh, February 27 — Haryana Chief Minister Sh. Nayab Singh Saini, while speaking during the Budget Session of the Haryana Vidhan Sabha, firmly defended the use of the word “naagrik” (citizens) in the Address and described the objection raised by Congress MLA Pooja as reflective of a fundamental difference in thinking rather than a mere semantic issue.
Responding to the written suggestion made by the Congress legislator to replace the word “naagrik” (citizens) with “nivaasi” (residents) in the Governor’s Address, the Chief Minister stated that the term “citizen” is intrinsically linked to the spirit of the Constitution, democratic rights, and duties, whereas the term “resident” merely indicates geographical presence. He emphasized that a resident may simply live in a place, but a citizen is an active participant in the state’s progress, policy-making, democratic processes, and social responsibilities.
The Chief Minister asserted that the people of Haryana are not merely inhabitants of the state but are its strength, identity, and architects of its future. He underlined that the word “citizen” reminds people not only of their rights but also of their duties, including the right to vote, respect for the rule of law, tax obligations, and responsibility towards society.
Highlighting Haryana’s proud legacy, he said the state has given the nation brave soldiers, hardworking farmers, world-class athletes, and enterprising entrepreneurs. Referring to such distinguished contributions, he remarked that limiting these accomplished individuals to the term “residents” would diminish the magnitude of their role and achievements.
The Chief Minister further stated that under the able leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the double-engine government is committed to empowering, securing, and honoring every citizen. He said that the expression “citizens of Haryana” is not merely a form of address but a proclamation of equal rights, equal opportunities, and shared responsibility, which embodies the true spirit of democracy.
Concluding his address, the Chief Minister said there is no need for any amendment to the Governor’s Address, as the meaning and sentiment of the word “citizen” are clear and constitutionally appropriate. He also assured the members of the House that the development needs raised by them during the discussion would be addressed with utmost seriousness and that every possible effort would be made to fulfill their demands. He appealed to the House to pass the Governor’s Address unanimously.
